Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. If I run it from Code::Blocks, it works correctly; but if I run it by doubleclicking on the executable file, a window pops up with this message:. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem. If you plan to distribute the executable, the latter probably makes the most sense. If you only plan to run it on your own machine, the changing the PATH environment variable is an attractive option keeps down the size of the executable.
I have found that linking those statically explodes the size up to 1,kb even with optimizations. It's kb larger compared to just copying over the shared DLLs. It's kb larger as well after UPXing everything. Just include the DLLs as the end-user can decide to delete them or not if they have them installed elsewhere. By the way, is it definitely compiler flag? Maybe linker is the more suitable term here? PATH if make. Go to the MinGW http sourceforge.
Copy and paste what you need into your bin directory. I know this isn't an option for most people, but thought I'd mention it as a workaround option :. Can't you put it in system32 or something like you do with others dll files, so that every program you try to run won't have that problem on your machine? By default, this is:. Make sure overwrite any existing files but make a backup copy of the original file.
Reboot your computer. You can also, create an alias on your profile [. In CodeBlocks you can go to Settings Add "-static" to other linker options solves this problem. I was just having the same issue after I tested this on another system, but not on my own, so even if you haven't noticed this on your development system, you should check that you have this set if you're statically linking. Another note, copying the DLL into the same folder as the executable is not a solution as it defeats the idea of statically linking.
Note: Any nested pages that are under this one will be moved up one level. Any attachments tied to this page will be deleted. One or more of the parent pages specified in new path do not exist! CodeWeavers We're rebels. CodeWeavers or its third-party tools process personal data e.
Thus you must use the compiler as a linker, rather than invoking ld directly, or you'll need to tell the linker where to find libgcc. Note also how you must be certain to give the machine compile options you compile with when you link the -mfoo and -fbar options, among others or you may get the wrong libgcc. If you want to know the full path of libgcc if you insist on linking with ld rather than your compiler , you can do so:.
You naturally also need to pass the machine compile options when using the -print-libgcc-file-name option. Make your build scripts or Makefile locate libgcc rather than hard-coding the path somewhere or other people will have a harder time building your operating system. The compiler is not required to emit calls to libgcc and on some platforms libgcc is a small library and you may be able to write complex programs that never need libgcc.
The compiler will only link in the specific parts of libgcc that are needed, since it is a static library. However, the compiler is free to change its mind and suddenly emit calls to libgcc if it is a Tuesday and the stock prices have gone up or you upgraded your compiler to a newer version.
See the above question. The compiler doesn't care if you actually link with libgcc , it will emit calls just the same. You will never get libgcc -related linking errors if you link with libgcc , which is simple and makes your kernel compilation process reliable.
Think of it this way: You went into the compiler source code and randomly commented out a few randomly chosen functions. The compiler still happens to work for your kernel, but will it always work for all the possible kernel source codes you can write? The libgcc library is part of the compiler and it would be foolish to unsafely disable parts of the compiler.
You must use the correct libgcc that came with your cross-compiler. Whatever else libgcc you found likely has a different target, was built with different machine compile options, has dependencies on the standard library, is part of a different compiler revision your distribution may have patched its gcc, even.
These troubleshooting steps are listed in the recommended order of execution. You can uninstall Wireshark software by following these instructions Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, and 10 :. When the first two steps haven't solved your issue, it might be a good idea to run Windows Update. To run Windows Update, please follow these easy steps:. Please note that this final step is recommended for advanced PC users only. Please follow the steps below to download and properly replace you file:. If this final step has failed and you're still encountering the error, you're only remaining option is to do a clean installation of Windows To avoid data loss, you must be sure that you have backed-up all of your important documents, pictures, software installers, and other personal data before beginning the process.
If you are not currently backing up your data, you need to do so immediately.
0コメント